October Term 2024
No. 24-304

Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings v. Davis

Petitioner Luke Davis · Respondent Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings

Reporter
605 U.S. ___ (2025)
From
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
How it got here
writ of <i>certiorari</i>

May a federal court certify a class action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(b)(3) when some members of the proposed class lack any Article III injury?

Question before the Court

What happened

Julian Vargas, who is blind, encountered inaccessible check-in kiosks at LabCorp facilities. Vargas attempted to use these kiosks but was unable due to their lack of accessibility for visually impaired individuals. As a result, he had to wait for assistance from a staff member, which delayed his check-in and denied him equal access to services such as maintaining his spot in the queue or updating personal information privately. Vargas claimed that this lack of accessibility infringed on his rights under disability laws, leading to the lawsuit. The district court certified two classes: a California class for Unruh Civil Rights Act claims and a nationwide class for claims under the ADA, the Rehabilitation Act, and the Affordable Care Act. LabCorp appealed the class certification, arguing that the plaintiffs lacked standing, but the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed the district court’s decision.

Pending
with the majority concurring in dissent recused filed an opinion

The holding

The writ of certiorari was dismissed as improvidently granted.

Argued by

For the petitioner
  • Noel J. Francisco for the Petitioner
For the respondent
  • Deepak Gupta for the Respondents
Amicus curiae
  • Sopan Joshi for the United States, as amicus curiae, supporting neither party

Case path

  1. Jan 24, 2025 granted
  2. Apr 29, 2025 argued
  3. Jun 5, 2025 decided

Read the opinions