October Term 2024
No. 23-980

Facebook v. Amalgamated Bank

Petitioner Facebook, Inc., et al. · Respondent Amalgamated Bank, et al.

Reporter
604 U.S. ___ (2024)
From
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
How it got here
writ of <i>certiorari</i>

Are risk disclosures false or misleading when they do not disclose that a risk has materialized in the past, even if that past event presents no known risk of ongoing or future business harm?

Question before the Court

What happened

Facebook, the world’s largest social media platform, faced scrutiny in 2018 when news broke that Cambridge Analytica, a British political consulting firm, had improperly harvested personal data from millions of unwitting Facebook users. The data originated from a personality quiz integrated on Facebook by Aleksandr Kogan, who gained access to users’ data and their Facebook friends’ data without consent. Although only about 270,000 users took the quiz, Kogan harvested data from over 30 million users. Cambridge Analytica used this data to create personality profiles of American voters, which were allegedly used to benefit political campaigns, including Donald Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign. Facebook learned of Cambridge Analytica’s misconduct in 2015 but failed to inform affected users. The company continued to investigate the data usage and negotiated a confidential settlement with Kogan in 2016. Despite assurances that the data had been deleted, Facebook discovered in 2016 that Cambridge Analytica was still using the data. The scandal became public in March 2018, leading to significant drops in Facebook's stock price. Shortly after, it was revealed that Facebook had been sharing user data with dozens of whitelisted third parties without express user consent, contradicting previous statements about data control and privacy. These revelations, along with subsequent privacy concerns and regulatory actions, led to further stock price declines and reduced revenue growth for Facebook. Shareholders filed a securities fraud action against Facebook and its executives, alleging violations of Sections 10(b), 20(a), and 20A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 of the Exchange Act's implementing regulations. The district court dismissed the shareholders’ claims, and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reversed, concluding that under the heightened standard of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act, the shareholders adequately pleaded falsity as to some of the challenged risk statements.

Pending
with the majority concurring in dissent recused filed an opinion

The holding

The Court dismissed the writ of certiorari as improvidently granted.

Argued by

For the petitioner
  • Kannon K. Shanmugam for the Petitioners
For the respondent
  • Kevin K. Russell for the Respondents
  • Kevin J. Barber for the United States, as amicus curiae, supporting the Respondents

Case path

  1. Jun 10, 2024 granted
  2. Nov 6, 2024 argued
  3. Nov 22, 2024 dismissed

Read the opinions